Malaysian dancer deported from Heathrow - testimonial

Visual and physical theatre artist Anna Masing invited her friend, a dancer from Malaysia, to collaborate and participate in a performance which would contribute to Masing's PhD study. The dancer Maryline Semba Mani was detained, treated with suspicion of being an "exotic dancer" and deported back to Malaysia. She was not being paid a fee for this engagement, as the relationship was based on a close friendship with Masing. She was not informed by the UK consulate about the new Permitted Paid Engagement visitor route. In fact, the consulate couldn't see a problem about her coming to the UK as a tourist on a general visitor visa.

Briefing Document: 32 Million CRB checks since 2002

The Case Against Vetting logo A new Manifesto Club briefing document finds that there have been 32 million CRB checks since 2002 - at a cost of £1.5 billion.

We argue that this has done little to protect children - and indeed could have done harm, by spreading an atmosphere of mistrust.

City promises to rein in over-officious security guards

It is common knowledge that photographers in the City of London face constant hassle from private security guards (see a film and blogpost on this here).

The Manifesto Club's Peter Lloyd approached City authorities, asking whether they planned to do anything about these over-officious private security guards.

With the help of councilman Alex Deane, we received the following heartening response:

Given the City’s history, it is vital that we remain vigilant. However, there is a need to strike the balance between the rights of the individual and the need to ensure that the City is safe for all those who either live, work or come to the city as tourists.

Child protection training industry

I was just passed an email from an organisation called 'Child Protection Training UK', which advertises its services thus:

'The New Ofsted inspection framework in place from January 2012 is bringing massive changes to the safeguarding procedures. Safeguarding will no longer be a limiting judgement, however it will fall under both leadership & management and behaviour and safety judgements. In addition, inspectors will be heavily scrutinising bullying and student’s abilities to assess and manage risk. In time of reform, are you confident your safeguarding procedures are up to date and aligned with the new Ofsted Inspection framework? Our courses provide information on how organisations can fulfil their safeguarding responsibilities.'

Criminalising Football Fans - The Case Against 'Bubble' Matches

the case against bubble matches imageAt ‘Bubble’ football matches, away fans are banned from all independent travel. Travelling fans are transported on licensed coaches and under police escort, from a designated pick-up point to a designated drop-off point. Fans often must pick up their tickets on route, such as at motorway service stations. Their freedom of movement is suspended.

The next ‘bubble’ restrictions will be imposed on Portsmouth supporters travelling to Southampton for the local derby on Saturday 7 April 2012.

This Manifesto Club report, Criminalising Football Fans, by Peter Lloyd, documents 48 of these 'bubble' matches. The report argues that such draconian travel restrictions punish the innocent majority of fans, rather than the minority intent on trouble making. These restrictions are grossly disproportionate to the actual threats, and their use should be reviewed.

Read the report

Contact report author Peter Lloyd on Peterdclloyd@aol.com or 07770496071


Pavement Injustice - Campaign Against On-the-Spot Fines

pavement injustice Over the past 10 years, public spaces have become increasingly policed by unaccountable officials bearing open-ended powers.

On-the-spot fines mean that police and other officials can punish people for a series of offences ‘on-the-spot’, without legal checks and balances. Criminal offences that would have been tried in court are now often dealt with like a parking ticket.

On-the-spot fines have been running at around 200,000 a year since they were introduced in 2004. Now ‘out of court’ punishments make up nearly half of all offences ‘brought to justice’.

The result has been arbitrary punishments for perfectly innocent activities. A woman was fined for feeding the ducks (‘littering’), as was a man who dropped a £10 note. One Women’s Institute group received threats of fines for putting up a poster (‘fly posting’), and handing out leaflets (‘unlicensed leafleting’), while others have been fined for putting up lost cat posters. A number of political protesters were issued with penalty notices for ‘harassment’, including an anti-CCTV campaigner who handed out leaflets to his neighbours.

A new Manifesto Club campaign against ‘pavement injustice’ will take on unaccountable officials in public spaces – investigating how powers are being used, and calling for their review and limitation. We want to defend the principle that justice is done properly in the courtroom, rather than on-the-spot by a badged busybody. And that law-abiding citizens should be able to use public spaces freely, without risking censure for feeding the ducks.

Syndicate content